000 01391nam a2200193 a 4500
005 20260305115015.0
008 251216s2025##################000#0#eng##
020 _a9783631580684
_qpbk
041 _aeng
082 0 4 _a226.506
_bOBI
100 1 _a Obielosi ,Dominic Chukwunonso
245 1 0 _aServant of God in John: 878 (European University Studies/Europaische Hochschulschriften. Reihe 23: Theologie)
_c/Dominic Chukwunonso Obielosi
260 _cPeter Lang Pub Inc
_a2008
300 _a330p,;
_c20 cm.
504 _aindex
520 _aThe topic of this book is to scholars what Uranus was to Scientists before 1781. The ignorance of astrologers about the existence of Uranus before 1781 does not negate the factuality of its being. This is similar in the case of the Servant of God in John. His predicates are there, although the title is missing. Scholars and epochs have witnessed researches and contributions in the Gospel of John. Many see aspects of the Servant of God in John. But just as Uranus could not be seen but its existence was proven because of its effects on the orbits of the other planets, so the Servant of God of the Fourth Gospel could not be seen as a title but its effects on the other christological titles of the gospel indicate its reality in the gospel. The author’s approach is purely exegetico-theological.
650 0 _aReligion
942 _cREF
999 _c603857
_d603857