000 | 02011nam a2200205Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 240825s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
020 |
_a9780821394526 _qpbk |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
082 |
_a352.630 _bPUB |
||
100 | _a- | ||
110 | _aStolen Asset Recovery Initiative(STAR) | ||
245 | 0 | _aPublic office, private interests: accountability through income and asset disclosure | |
250 | _a- | ||
260 |
_bThe world bank _cc2012 _aNew york |
||
300 |
_axv, 150 p. _bill. _c23 c.m. |
||
490 | _aStolen asset recovery series | ||
520 | _a“Public Office, Private Interests: Accountability through Income and Asset Disclosure” examines the objectives, design features, and implementation approaches that can contribute to the effectiveness of an income and asset disclosure (IAD) system, and enhance its impact as a prevention and enforcement tool. It draws on detailed case studies that are published in a companion volume: “Income and Asset Disclosure: Case Study Illustrations”The companion volume “Income and Asset Disclosure: Case Study Illustrations” includes case studies of the IAD systems in Argentina, Croatia, Guatemala, Hong Kong SAR, Indonesia, Jordan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Rwanda, Slovenia, and the United States. Case studies were conducted through review of the legal framework, desk research and interviews with practitioners, academics, and representatives of civil society. Each case study outlines the legal framework for the IAD regime, the mandate and structure of the IAD agency, and the resources and procedures of the IAD system. The characteristics of each system are highlighted along with other findings that illuminate the challenges faced in implementing the system, the steps taken, and the progress achieved by the IAD agency in fulfilling its mandate. There are a wide variety of approaches in IAD system design and implementation and a wide variety of challenges faced by different systems. | ||
650 | _aPublic Sector Development | ||
942 | _cENGLISH | ||
999 |
_c540166 _d540166 |